Saturday, May 29, 2010

Who Pays For Peruvian Baby Shower

!

The last class we did a review prior to the partial, which surely will have spoken much of the first set that I can write in this post. Pending the response I have some mails sent during the weekend, which is why it seems appropriate and enjoyable for all, make some clarifications on the part of the medium. Let's face it, to talk about the part and do a review, and after a date is special purpose, which is why I hope they could use the refresher class.

With regard to the consultations, we reiterate, once again, that part is written first and the second part consists of an oral conversation. The first letter, the second mouth.

Whether we pursue this matter to all others that you also will be studying, it is best to prepare the matter through their program (must prepare the agenda, whether they are in the schedule or not.) We give classes of guiding us through the program, which I suggest to follow the order to prepare a good part.

the second set to fall some issues that do not go for it, why, as a good-or bad-news, as you know the conference to discuss the themes that bridge the general theory of contracts and begin with the beginning of the special, with typical contracts in particular. That is, the issue of consumer legislation (consumer protection law and consumer contracts) as well as responsibility post-contractual and extinction, are topics that we are used to evaluate in detail in the conference but need not be known in particular for the first since it is evaluated in the second. Not have to study the law of consumer protection and consumer contracts for this first part does not prevent that if they do not know at the symposium, difil pass on a good note it.

For this first part is not necessary to consider the special part of the contracts, which we will from now on and throughout this year of the Bicentennial, but as I presume will have prepared very well the issue of classification as you may discern whether a particular contract is random or not, etc..
With regard to the concept of contract is not something to be taken explicitly, simply if you do not know who is speaking when he says the contract, it hardly gets high marks!

As you know, this blog can not tell how the themes that agenda or not, it would be improper for this post, I assume also for this purpose have had a review class.

We are not used to take things that have not been treated or spoken in class, but we have not taxed the same, which maybe why not ask the same way that we express in class. Same if you clearly understand all the issues of class may have a good result in the set.

I hope we continue, with contracts!







Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Stent In Kidney While Pregnant How To Treat It

One more thing in this world that gives me a good laugh

Prahlad Jani Yogi of India claims to have survived for more than 70 years without eating, without drinking, without urinating or defecating. Was recently observed, monitored by cameras 24 hours, several days by a team of doctors who say they are puzzled by the mystery (see press release ). The issue seems to be simply a wonder more than medicine and the capabilities of the human body. But it is just that. According to our understanding of the universe completely violates the yogi laws of contemporary physics. According to our knowledge no physical or biological system can be sustained independently. This is a corollary of the most beautiful natural pattern found in the world: Clausius Act or Second Law of Thermodynamics . To put it another way, the yogi seems to be generating energy from nothing to keep your body alive, and this simply can not be. The other option, as you say doctors, is that he is getting energy (and water) from a source other than food. The options are the sun, stars, the mystic energy of the cosmos. How can this happens, how it is possible that there may be the mystical energy of the cosmos, is something that is equally inexplicable to science. In short, the dilemma is this: either the science has a fundamental error in their understanding of reality or science has a fundamental error in their understanding of reality. No choice. It is a fact.

gives me a good laugh how an old yogi "shit" on top of all Western science without even getting dirty in the process. And all this makes me think that we Westerners have miserably all our eggs placed in the basket of the rational, violating in this context, one of the very principles of rationality. If this is not a sensible space, formal, 'academic', where respect, good manners and words prove, I would be compelled by my resentment to say, as my fellow coast, a great truth: " worth dick "(alas, that vulgarity, my God, that lack of respect.)

science and philosophy do not provide answers but trivial problems, but we feel committed to continue to think only in platitudes. So the Habermas and Hawkings of the world seems to have his life insured.


Recently, the European Minister Foreign and United Nations independent reporting showing conclusively that in the near future there will be massive food shortages, famine and drought. Lack water and people will starve with both hands. Apparently humanity has in front of a bleak future .
But, that is, no more missing, is that we have no final solution at hand? We must allow scientists to lock up that fucking yogi in a room lit 24 hours, open it in two if necessary, up to unveil her secret, damn selfish old, supposedly blessed by a goddess, the bastard. Scientists to save us from famine finally bagging Indian mystery in a green pill flavored Beef or Broccoli for vegetarians are not followed the very dudes complaining that we do not have in mind. That sell gold nugget in a tile with the Pfizer logo . Maybe legalize generic and I can buy a box promotion.
only ask, very humble gentlemen scientists who make a version for cats, which as you know have different nutritional needs to humans.


PS: Look at the final press release on the Indian link above: "Yogi underwent an MRI scanner magnetic. His brain and heart activity were measured with electrodes and perform blood tests. The detailed results will be published in the coming months and hopes to take advantage of the DRDO to increase the resistance of the military or helping victims of natural disasters . " Sincerely

these scientists are seriously engaged with some of the laughter.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Extending Outlets After Backsplash

Presentation of the Book! International Arbitration and Arbitration

Monday May 17, 2010 at 18:30 pm.

SUM, L. Ambrosio Institute Gioja

Prof. Dr. Lidia Cordobera MR Garrido, will be present next Monday 17 of this year's Bicentennial Gioja Institute, which is investigating and has been reelected last year as an advisory member on the occasion of presentation of his book The risk of developing a comparative approach: Argentine law and English law.
The presentation will be given by former Vice Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) and Professor at the Faculty of Law, A Coruña, Professor Dr. Domingo Bello Janeiro.

accompany the book's author in the presentation of relevant national and international academic, distinguished colleagues, and known personalities Argentina and abroad as well as their teachers, assistants, interns, students and friends who fervently celebrate this new release!

I hope we, Making Contracts!

How To Write On Wedding Card

Consumer! Whole

Monday, May 17 at 18:30 pm. SUM
Institute Ambrosio Gioja
Speakers: Dr. Domingo Bello Janeiro
Dr. Lidia MR Garrido Cordobera

Coordinators: Dr. Sebastian Barocelli Dr. Walter
Krieger

Invites: Research Seminar Permanent Damage Problems in Today's Society, Institute of Social and Legal Research " Lucas Ambrosio Gioja "

More information:
sociedadactual@derecho.uba.ar
I hope we, Making Contracts!