Saturday, May 29, 2010

Who Pays For Peruvian Baby Shower

!

The last class we did a review prior to the partial, which surely will have spoken much of the first set that I can write in this post. Pending the response I have some mails sent during the weekend, which is why it seems appropriate and enjoyable for all, make some clarifications on the part of the medium. Let's face it, to talk about the part and do a review, and after a date is special purpose, which is why I hope they could use the refresher class.

With regard to the consultations, we reiterate, once again, that part is written first and the second part consists of an oral conversation. The first letter, the second mouth.

Whether we pursue this matter to all others that you also will be studying, it is best to prepare the matter through their program (must prepare the agenda, whether they are in the schedule or not.) We give classes of guiding us through the program, which I suggest to follow the order to prepare a good part.

the second set to fall some issues that do not go for it, why, as a good-or bad-news, as you know the conference to discuss the themes that bridge the general theory of contracts and begin with the beginning of the special, with typical contracts in particular. That is, the issue of consumer legislation (consumer protection law and consumer contracts) as well as responsibility post-contractual and extinction, are topics that we are used to evaluate in detail in the conference but need not be known in particular for the first since it is evaluated in the second. Not have to study the law of consumer protection and consumer contracts for this first part does not prevent that if they do not know at the symposium, difil pass on a good note it.

For this first part is not necessary to consider the special part of the contracts, which we will from now on and throughout this year of the Bicentennial, but as I presume will have prepared very well the issue of classification as you may discern whether a particular contract is random or not, etc..
With regard to the concept of contract is not something to be taken explicitly, simply if you do not know who is speaking when he says the contract, it hardly gets high marks!

As you know, this blog can not tell how the themes that agenda or not, it would be improper for this post, I assume also for this purpose have had a review class.

We are not used to take things that have not been treated or spoken in class, but we have not taxed the same, which maybe why not ask the same way that we express in class. Same if you clearly understand all the issues of class may have a good result in the set.

I hope we continue, with contracts!







0 comments:

Post a Comment